Monday, February 16, 2015
Readership: What do not see, that you want to see? Should I take commissions?
Pursuant to a dissussion on Rod Adams' blog, I'm likely going to be digging into ultrasupercritical steam cycles today. This made me realize that most people who do this are either paid money for the effort, or are studying so they can be paid money for it.Should I be taking commissions for analytical posts? Something like GoFundMe? I can use the money.
Are there any gaps in the public-domain analysis out there that maybe I could fill?
Bend my (virtual) ear.
¶ 2/16/2015 01:20:00 PM
Comments:
<< Home
It couldn't hurt to post a tip jar - I don't have any ideas for specific analysis I'd like you to look into, but I've always enjoyed your posts and I'd throw something in to the tip jar.
I've alway enjoyed your posts, too.
FWIW, I bought a couple books about how solar and wind just isn't enough to supply all the energy required by future world. You should write a book, too.
FWIW, I bought a couple books about how solar and wind just isn't enough to supply all the energy required by future world. You should write a book, too.
More about nuclear reactors - maybe something on the relative merits and demerits of various reactor designs.
I learn a lot from your comments when you're helping an entire website to understand why their faith in RE as the savior of mankind is misplaced, and their aversion to nuclear power misguided (quite a heroic job you did over at Renewable Energy World, by the way). Have you ever considered writing an extended essay on the topic?
I learn a lot from your comments when you're helping an entire website to understand why their faith in RE as the savior of mankind is misplaced, and their aversion to nuclear power misguided (quite a heroic job you did over at Renewable Energy World, by the way). Have you ever considered writing an extended essay on the topic?
Perhaps like this one (http://www.templar.co.uk/downloads/Renewable%20Energy%20Limitations.pdf) without the grammatical and punctuation errors, oftentimes awkward prose, and thinly veiled expressions of doubt that AGW is real?
Post a Comment
<< Home
