The Ergosphere
Sunday, November 13, 2005

Do the math

One simple change to semi-trailers can reduce total fuel consumption of the rig by 10%.  If we could save 10% of US diesel consumption, that would be approximately 277,000 barrels/day or 101 million barrels/year.  This is just one simple change which could be retrofitted; it's only the beginning of possible improvements.

Oil production from Alaska averaged 908,000 bbl/day last year (down 55% from its 1988 peak of 2.02 million bbl/day).  ANWR reserves are estimated at 6.4 billion barrels.  In short, if we started trying to produce ANWR oil today and it first hit the pipeline in 2015, semi-truck boattails could have saved 1/6 of the total oil in the reserve before the first barrel got to a refinery (and probably at a much smaller cost).  Improvements which cut consumption by 30% are likely both possible and inexpensive, and would save a full ANWR-worth in the next 20 years.

The US Senate has wisely removed ANWR drilling from the bill to cut the budget.  If our Senators are wiser, they should also insert a provision over-riding state truck length limits for boat-tail extensions and other drag-reducing devices.

Every time you post something like this I scratch my head and think, "Why haven't we been doing this all along?" A 10% decrease in transport expenses must look attractive to companies, even in good times.
One reason this hasn't happened is state length restrictions on trucks.  You could build a trailer with a boat-tail, but if it was a cargo area it would make it harder to load and unload and prevent anything above a certain size from being loaded through rear doors.  An empty boat-tail would cut the cargo capacity of the trailer.

This sort of thing really needs federal action to override the patchwork of state regulations.  Should I start writing sample letters to legislators?
It's just a pity that it buggers up one of my favourite pieces of engineering, the Moffatt Mounty, a three-wheeled forklift that climbs onto the back of the truck using its forks and folds up, so whereever you roam, you have a fork lift to load and unload. Be hard to fit the thing on there with the boat tail.
Looks like the Moffet Mounty is aimed more at flatbeds than box trailers.  Boxes tend to be loaded and unloaded at loading docks, which usually have their own fork trucks.  Flatbeds don't have the square aft ends suitable for boat-tails anyway.

The Mounty isn't full-width past a certain height, so it looks like a fairing could still fit around the top sections; it just wouldn't be quite as
Also, if the boat tail can be folded out of the way, which from the photo appears to be part of the design, then it shouldn't behave differently than a non-boat tailed trailer.
"Should I start writing sample letters to legislators?"

Yes! You've got the numbers to do it. I'll sign it if you circulate an email or petition.

Parlty inspired by the math you've shown on your blog, I've been talking about the potential gains from efficiency in comparison to gains from drilling in ANWR at various blogs for the past few weeks. When you start to actually do the numbers, the claims that ANWR has anything to do with energy independence and not greater profits for Exxon is rediculous. We could do so much more with fuel efficiency improvements.
Okay, you've just given me some fodder for a whole new family of blog posts:  fact lists for letters.

Every fact will come with a cite, of course.
I wonder if the boat-tail would interfere with the stacking of trailers on railcars or on ships.
If a boat-tail can fold back to allow normal access to a loading dock, stacking should be impaired slightly if at all.

Standard cargo containers probably wouldn't have boat-tails; those would be part of the trailer they ride on.
I tend to go by a simple rule with ideas like this. Trucking firms know a lot more about these things than I do, and they're much more highly motivated than I am, therefore I assume that if they haven't done this, it doesn't pay.

But hey, write to big trucking firms. Let me suggest JB Hunt, Yellow Freight, and UPS.
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home
Talk largely about energy and work, but also politics and other random thoughts

Mail Engineer-Poet

(If you're mailing a question, is it already in the FAQ?)

Important links

The Reference Library

Blogchild of

Armed and Dangerous

Blogparent of


The best prospect for our energy future:
Flibe Energy

January 1990 / February 2004 / March 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / August 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / April 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / September 2014 / October 2014 / November 2014 / February 2015 / April 2015 / October 2015 / March 2016 / April 2016 / May 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 /

Powered by Blogger

RSS feed

Visits since 2006/05/11: