The Ergosphere
Friday, October 22, 2010
 

Why the Integral Fast Reactor had to die

Over at The Oil Drum, I left this comment, not really grasping the enormity:

Fast breeders can turn any isotope of uranium into energy (as well as burning all the transuranics), so you might want to look at this 2008 paper:

During the 50 years that the Federal Government controlled the U.S. uranium enrichment enterprise, DOE generated over 700,000 metric tons of depleted uranium hexafluoride (DUF6).

About 10% of that is suitable for enrichment to LWR fuel, but fast breeders or converters can use 100% of it.  At 0.8 tons of metal/GW-yr, that is 590,000 GW-yr of generation or 590 years at 1 TWe without mining another gram of uranium.  The USA is currently using about 450 GW average.

A Gen IV nuclear reactor will probably have a thermal efficiency of about 40%; therefore, 1 TWe = 2.5 TWth.  What I didn't realize at the moment is how this compares to total US energy consumption.  The USA uses approximately 100 quadrillion BTU per year, give or take.  This is just a bit over 3.3 TWth.  The conclusion is that uranium already in the US inventory, burned in Integral Fast reactors, could power the USA for over 400 years at current rates of consumption!

I'm sure you see the implications.  The coal-mining industry:  gone.  The gas-drilling industry:  gone.  Coal transport by rail and barge:  gone.  Gas and oil pipelines:  gone.  Oil refining:  reduced to supplying the chemical industry.

"What's the problem," I hear people asking.  "Wouldn't we rather be without gas-line explosions and oil spills in our rivers and seas?"  Well, it depends who you are.  If you are one of the monied interests in the carbon-based fuel sector, these things represent huge amounts of wealth wiped out, and the rest transferred to regulated monopolies.  All of the power they create today, everything that lets those industry heads rub elbows with senators and play golf with heads of state... gone.

They can't let that happen, even if it would take 50 years.  That's why the Integral Fast Reactor had to die.

(Edit 26 Feb 2018:  DOE paper succumbed to link rot.  Wayback Machine link substituted.)

Labels: , ,

 
Tuesday, October 12, 2010
 

Worthwhile post on small nuclear reactors

Rod Adams has a post on small nuclear reactors, including some notes on the 1961 SL-1 reactor accident (now coming up on its 50th anniversary).

Labels: , ,

 
Talk largely about energy and work, but also politics and other random thoughts


Mail Engineer-Poet

(If you're mailing a question, is it already in the FAQ?)

Important links

The FAQ
Glossary
The Reference Library

Blogchild of

Armed and Dangerous

Blogparent of

R-Squared




The best prospect for our energy future:
Flibe Energy

ARCHIVES
January 1990 / February 2004 / March 2004 / June 2004 / July 2004 / August 2004 / September 2004 / October 2004 / November 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / August 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / February 2007 / March 2007 / April 2007 / December 2007 / January 2008 / May 2008 / June 2008 / August 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / February 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / May 2009 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / November 2009 / December 2009 / January 2010 / April 2010 / May 2010 / June 2010 / July 2010 / August 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / January 2011 / February 2011 / March 2011 / April 2011 / May 2011 / July 2011 / August 2011 / September 2011 / October 2011 / April 2013 / November 2013 / December 2013 / January 2014 / February 2014 / March 2014 / April 2014 / July 2014 / August 2014 / September 2014 / October 2014 / November 2014 / February 2015 / April 2015 / October 2015 / March 2016 / April 2016 / May 2016 / June 2016 / July 2016 / November 2016 / December 2016 / February 2017 / May 2017 / June 2017 / September 2017 / October 2017 / November 2017 / March 2018 / May 2018 / June 2018 / October 2018 / December 2018 / January 2019 / March 2019 / June 2019 / October 2019 / November 2019 / March 2020 / June 2020 / December 2020 / March 2021 / April 2021 / May 2021 / July 2021 / January 2022 / February 2022 /


Powered by Blogger

RSS feed

Visits since 2006/05/11: